Search for: "Spells v. State" Results 1081 - 1100 of 2,273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court’s decision in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 6:22 am by Robert Chesney
When the scope of the interstate commerce authority expanded during World War II, with the Supreme Court’s 1942 Wickard v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am by SHG
Sexual predators will have “Sexual Predator” spelled out, while sexual offenders will have “943.0435 F.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 3:48 pm
Quest Recovery Services, Inc., 06-263 The Court GVR'd this ADA case to the 6th Circuit so that it could consider both the views of the United States as intervenor and the Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
The only limitation spelled out in this OLC opinion was that the operations must be limited in duration and scope, so as not to rise to the level of a full-scale “war,” which only Congress can declare.16 This opinion broke new ground.17 It went far beyond any rationale of self-defense or imminent threat to justify the use of military force without an authorization from Congress. [read post]
The standards most commonly referred to by bankruptcy courts for establishing that undue hardship is imposed on the debtor or a dependent of the debtor are spelled out in the case of Brunner v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 8:12 pm by D. Todd Smith
The case is Rio Grande Regional Hospital Inc. and Columbia Rio Grande Healthcare L.P. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 8:12 pm by D. Todd Smith
The case is Rio Grande Regional Hospital Inc. and Columbia Rio Grande Healthcare L.P. v. [read post]
The standards most commonly referred to by bankruptcy courts for establishing that undue hardship is imposed on the debtor or a dependent of the debtor are spelled out in the case of Brunner v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 3:30 am by Adrian Vermeule
United States (U.S. 1936), Hickman and Bednar show that there has long been a category of cases, involving difficult questions of public policy, in which judges know that they don’t know enough to spell out in detail what exactly ambiguous statutes should mean. [read post]