Search for: "Standard Jury Instructions-Criminal Cases"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,720
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2012, 11:38 pm
According to the Florida Committee on Standard Jury Instruction in Criminal Cases, judges have an obligation to warn jurors against using "electronic devices or computers to talk about [a] case, including tweeting, texting, blogging, e-mailing, or posting information on the web... [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:43 am
The Taser doesn’t change that analysis; pre-existing Graham case law holds that all use of force, deadly or not, is evaluated under that standard. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 5:13 pm
In so doing, the Court held that the state trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury on Booker’s eligibility for parole was neither contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of, Simmons v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:54 am
Not so in Dowdy’s case. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:41 am
One criminal case from the US Supreme Court this week, a summary reversal in Coleman v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:26 am
” Similarly, in In Re: Standard Jury Instructions In Criminal Cases-Report No. 2010-01 And Standard Jury Instructions In Civil Cases, Report No. 2010-01., the Florida Supreme Court issued a decision last week that adopted an updated version of the Standard Jury Instructions to include a section admonishing jurors to refrain from using social media and mobile devices during the trial. [read post]
28 May 2012, 7:09 pm
The problem for Zimmerman is the notoriety of this case — any judge is going to want to avoid making that call and find a reason to let the case go to the jury. [read post]
27 May 2012, 7:05 am
As I've written previously, the changes in statements of W-6 (John), W-12 (wife of w-13) and W-2 (the sister without her contacts who saw, and then didn't see, two figures chasing each other) are not a big deal. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:25 am
ABA Criminal Justice Standard 3-3.9(a) states, “A prosectuor should not . . . permit the continued pendency of criminal charges in the absence of of sufficient admissible evidence to support a conviction. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:42 am
ABA Criminal Justice Standard 3-3.9(a) states, “A prosectuor should not . . . permit the continued pendency of criminal charges in the absence of of sufficient admissible evidence to support a conviction. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 pm
I am not satisfied that there is sufficient evidence before me at this stage to conclude that, a properly instructed jury in Hamilton, will deliver anything but a true verdict in this case [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:23 am
What he had instead was a Court of Criminal Appeals ruling that reversed his conviction based on ineffective counsel and supported a lower court's finding that the evidence against him was too weak for a reasonable jury to convict him. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:40 am
Department of Justice has a lot riding on his case, too. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:40 am
Department of Justice has a lot riding on his case, too. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:15 pm
At its May 24, 2012 Conference, the Court will consider such issues as whether police use of a Taser constitutes excessive force, the evidentiary standard to overcome the presumption of patent validity, and becoming a “fugitive” by challenging, instead of reporting for, deportation. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:26 pm
based standard set out in [Utah Code] section 76? [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:24 am
The case is instructive on not only the legal issues it addresses – among them, federal habeas review, the admissibility of evidence, and the confrontation clause – but also on the motivations and allegiances of the judges that comprise our Circuit.A Michigan jury convicted Lewis Gagne of two counts of first-degree criminal sexual misconduct. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:29 am
Numerous cases and Florida's standard jury instructions make this clear, as does a plain reading of the statute. [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:52 pm
Three bedrock principles in every criminal case are the presumption of innocence, the burden of proof, and the standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:58 am
The jury saw a copy of the seized set of documents - the standard court order dated March 10, 2010, accepting his plea deal, providing for no jail time and two years probation, and the surreal documents Cox used to abrogate the plea, including the paperwork for his now-famous "trial" in a Denny's restaurant before a jury of his pals in which he was acquitted. [read post]
