Search for: "State of North Carolina v. United States"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 2,927
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2016, 8:49 am
United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932). [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 8:34 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:23 am
The Fourth Circuit, in its unpublished opinion, lined up with the Seventh Circuit (United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
See United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 1:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 1:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 8:52 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 3:12 pm
United States District Judge Steven D. [read post]
13 May 2013, 11:34 am
Notably, there is a similar case pending before the Fourth Circuit (covering Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia), which has the authority to uphold the rule for those states within its jurisdiction. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am
With the exception of the petition in the North Carolina voting case, North Carolina v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 1:31 pm
The Fourth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
In total, more than 100 million tonnes of ash are stored in North Carolina alone. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 11:06 am
”)The intrastate nature of the transaction was not changed by the existence of a national warranty or the fact that the homebuyer used a bank in North Carolina to finance his home purchase. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 11:06 am
”)The intrastate nature of the transaction was not changed by the existence of a national warranty or the fact that the homebuyer used a bank in North Carolina to finance his home purchase. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 6:01 am
In North Carolina, the answer generally is yes. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 11:53 am
29 Aug 2016, 2:21 pm
The North Carolina Legislature recently passed a law that required public entities to maintain single-sex bathrooms and showers (again, setting aside single-occupancy units), with the sex to be determined by the person’s birth certificate. [read post]
