Search for: "State v. Bird" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2015, 3:00 am by Broc Romanek
The SLB also touches on the Rule 14a-8(i)(7) litigation playing out in Trinity Wall Street v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:17 am by David Kravets
One of the Obama administration’s main arguments in support of warrantless GPS tracking was the high court’s 1983 decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:13 pm by David Kravets
One of the Obama administration’s main arguments in support of warrantless GPS tracking is the high court’s 1983 decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Yet collective action problems, while serious, aren’t the only problems that the United States faces. [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  If you’re categorizing “birds,” hollow bones are perfectly predictive but not observable, so that’s not how ordinary people implement the category “birds. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Wanker and Titmouse actually have really easy explanations (product differences and audience interests—beer is an adult product and clothing is not so there’s more scope; the Titmouse clothing had a bird logo and the Titmouse computer peripheral was a mouse in the shape of a woman’s breast; Madonna was litigated at a different point in time, but that’s also true of genericity); it’s true that the Pussy ones are more inconsistent. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:03 am by Keith Gerver
 He notes that we think of drones as “roaming birds of prey” that occasionally strike swiftly. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
You can’t see him letting the bird go in SD; you shouldn’t have to be knocked out of the emotional moment by asking “what is he doing in that black chunk of the screen? [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and… [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Victor
Daniel Shaviro, Man Who Lost too Much: Zarin v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:00 am by Administrator
Through its bird’s eye view, it highlights the remarkable number and variable nature of past attempts at law reform and suggests a shifting tide. [read post]