Search for: "State v. Borough"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,324
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2010, 6:30 am
The problem for Newham is/was that their allocations policy states that allocations medical assessments are to be done in-house by an officer as part of a particular team. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:30 am
The problem for Newham is/was that their allocations policy states that allocations medical assessments are to be done in-house by an officer as part of a particular team. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:00 am
Pinsky, Parks Commissioner Adrian Benepe, New York Secretary of State Lorraine Cortés-Vázquez, Metropolitan Waterfront Alliance President and CEO Roland Lewis, and an array of New York City waterfront advocates. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 1:45 pm
The guidance is, mostly, explaining and endorsing the effect of R (G) v LB Southwark [2009] UKHL 26 (see our note here). [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 1:45 pm
The guidance is, mostly, explaining and endorsing the effect of R (G) v LB Southwark [2009] UKHL 26 (see our note here). [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:01 am
Salford City Council v Mullen: Hounslow London Borough Council v Hall; Leeds City Council v Hall; Birmingham City Council v Frisby; Manchester City Council v Mushin (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 336; [2010] WLR (D) 91 ”Guidance for county courts hearing applications for possession orders by local authority landlords of non-secure tenancies where the occupier, being an… [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:38 am
In LB Southwark v Over 13,000 Leaseholders in the borough LON/00BE/LDC/2009/0061 (not yet available online), the LVT rejected an application for dispensation under s.20ZA, 1985 Act. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:54 am
For four years, David was the solicitor for the Borough of Swarthmore, and now serves on the Swarthmore Borough Authority.Joseph Petersen is a partner in the Intellectual Property group in the New York office of Kilpatrick Stockton LLP. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:56 am
Bury Metropolitan Borough Council v Gibbons [2010] EWCA Civ 327 This was the Court of Appeal judgment on a second appeal from a s.204 Housing Act 1996 appeal in the County Court. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:15 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) FJ Chalke Ltd & Anor v Revenue & Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 313 (25 March 2010) Mason v Richard Freeman & Co (a firm) [2010] EWCA Civ 287 (25 March 2010) Bury Metropolitan Borough Council v Gibbons [2010] EWCA Civ 327 (26 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Kirman, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 614 (25 March 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) London Borough of Hillingdon & Ors, R (on the… [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:23 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court kicked off its week with Klummp v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 1:19 am
The borough of Avalon's lawyer, Michael Donohue, said Edward and Nancy Klummp should have been aware decades ago that the borough had seized the property, noting that the tax bill was 46 cents. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 12:17 pm
Borough of Avalon, No. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:23 pm
McVicker v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:51 am
The Court considered R (on the application of Zoolife International Limited) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2007] EWHC 2995 (Admin) on the issue of hearing academic cases. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:51 am
The Court considered R (on the application of Zoolife International Limited) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2007] EWHC 2995 (Admin) on the issue of hearing academic cases. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 4:26 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) McKeown v British Horseracing Authority [2010] EWHC 508 (QB) (12 March 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Rowe, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 524 (Admin) (12 March 2010) Cooperative Group Ltd, R (on the application of) v Northumberland County Council [2010] EWHC 373 (Admin) (12 March 2010) Raw, R (on the application of) v London Borough of… [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:28 pm
"* The decision indicates that DOI was investigating the content of Parkhouse's statement at the hearing, alleged to constitute an “inaccurate reading of the Borough President's letter,” and quoting from Herbert v Lando, 441 US 153, states that the “spreading false information in and of itself carries no First Amendment credentials … as there is no constitutional value in false statements of fact…. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 12:31 pm
In Ladele v. [read post]
