Search for: "State v. Carter"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,958
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
In Cal Fed v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 3:56 am
Refusing to dismiss her retaliation claims under the First Amendment, Title VII, and state law, the court found that her complaints raised a matter of public concern as to the mismanagement of the department’s workforce (Chen v Maricopa County). [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:20 am
Carter v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 12:05 pm
Bd. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:35 am
Carter, on filing deadlines for claims of fraud against the government; 13-43, Maersk Drilling USA v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 12:43 pm
In a decision that expands the First Amendment’s definition of protectable speech, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held in Bland v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 7:57 am
Carter Phillips provides powerful support in an amicus brief filed for the Chamber of Commerce. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:01 am
Carter, supra. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm
During Jimmy Carter’s term in office, 41 female judges were appointed to the federal judiciary. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
Carter-Wallace, Inc., 97 F.3d 1227, 1234, 35 Fed. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
Carter-Wallace, Inc., 97 F.3d 1227, 1234, 35 Fed. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:43 am
"Bland et al. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:43 am
"Bland et al. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Carter 12-1497Issue: (1) Whether the Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act – a criminal code provision that tolls the statute of limitations for “any offense” involving fraud against the government “[w]hen the United States is at war,” 18 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm
Carter, in which the Court refused to say whether the Constitution required presidents to get any form of congressional consent to withdraw the United States from a treaty that the Senate had ratified. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 11:51 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In an important free speech decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit this week in Bland v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 10:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:18 am
Carter Snead is the William P. and Hazel B. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 4:20 pm
It was held in Carter v State of New York that an individual who has been wrongfully convicted and incarcerated and who meets the requirements of the statute is entitled to an award of damages, the amount of which is determined in accordance with traditional tort and other common-law principles. [read post]