Search for: "State v. Catoe"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 1:07 pm
New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:37 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:54 pm
Lopez (1995), United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:09 am
Kholi and Walker v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:24 am
The Justices took no action today in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am
Title: Smith v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 9:22 am
Adam Schaeffer of the Cato Institute writes in All of Your Money Belongs to the State that the 9th circuit thinks just that: Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments in an appeal of a 9th Circuit decision, Winn v Garriott, a challenge to one of Arizona’s education tax credit programs. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:31 pm
The anti-trade activists at Public Citizen recently contended that "[v]irtually every Democrat in a tough race has at least one paid television ad attacking offshoring, and many propose changes to the tax system to combat it. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:58 am
In a brief opinion piece at Cato@Liberty, John Samples discusses SpeechNow’s success despite the denial. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:38 am
Title: Davis v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:58 am
Ilya Shapiro (no relation), who helped out with the brief on behalf of Cato, has a post about it here. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:00 am
The Institute for Justice, the Cato Institute, and the Beckett Fund for Religious Liberty have weighed in on Tuck-It-Away, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 12:16 pm
Jim Burling filed an amicus for The Cato Institute and Pacific Legal Foundation (supporting the Petitioners). [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
Title: Allshouse v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 10:46 am
BennettDocket: 10-238Issue(s): (1) Whether the First Amendment forbids states from providing additional government subsidies to publicly financed candidates that are triggered by independent expenditure groups' speech against such candidates; and (2) whether the First Amendment forbids states from providing additional government subsidies to publicly financed candidates that are triggered by the fundraising or expenditures by these candidates' privately financed… [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm
Nebraska and Roe v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:40 pm
In Maunalua Bay Beach Ohana 28 v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 11:45 am
The case is Maunalua Bay Beach Ohana 28 v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:21 am
Jonathan Adler of the National Review (via NPR) and Ilya Shapiro at the CATO Institute highlight upcoming cases of interest. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:07 pm
Among other things, it explains why the mandate runs afoul of the five part test established in the Supreme Court’s most recent Necessary and Proper Clause decision, United States v. [read post]
