Search for: "State v. Davis "
Results 1081 - 1100
of 6,078
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2020, 7:12 am
(relisted after the February 21 and February 28 conferences) Davis v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
But query whether in the federalism context, where other plain-statement rules such as that announced in 1991 in Gregory v Ashcroft (which requires Congress to clearly say in the text of a regulatory statute that the statute applies to state and local government entities before states can be required to obey) seem designed to make sure Congress has carefully considered state interests, Congress itself has to be the one to fix any vagueness problems in the terms of… [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:04 pm
" United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 7:10 am
United States Railroad Retirement Board, 2/24/20: Fulton v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 9:15 pm
Davis II chair in law at The Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law Peter M. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
This past summer, in Gundy v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
Davis v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 12:26 pm
See Virginia Dep't of State Police, 386 F.3d at 575 (quoting Stone v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:09 am
” Bivens itself involved “an allegedly unconstitutional arrest and search carried out in New York City,” while Davis v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 3:45 am
” In an op-ed at Townhall, Mike Davis weighs in on Google v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 7:33 am
Davis, ___ N.C. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 10:29 am
Chooseco LLC v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:31 am
In Davis v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
United States and Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:53 am
State Bar of Wisconsin 19-831Issue: Whether Lathrop v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:31 am
Halper, Ellen V. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 7:45 am
Briefly: At The Oklahoman (via How Appealing), Chris Casteel reports that in a brief filed last week in McGirt v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 3:45 am
The decision of the Court of Appeal The Court of Appeal ([2019] EWCA Civ 809: Underhill, Davis and Davies LLJ) determined that the applicable standard of proof of death by suicide in inquest proceedings is the civil standard of proof (at [74]), and that this standard should be applied to both short-form and narrative conclusions (at §[73]). [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:07 am
Davis, when it is plausible that the failure to investigate that aspect of petitioner’s background on state postconviction review could, given substantial authority recognizing counsel’s duty to do so, excuse the procedural default of an ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim. [read post]
