Search for: "State v. Holm"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2007, 8:04 pm
Holmes talked at great length about Kennedy’s consenting opinion. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 12:21 pm
Holmes v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 10:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:12 am
The Court quoted from that opinion by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.: "The state...has the last word as to whether its mountains shall be stripped of their forests and its inhabitants shall breathe pure air. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
In Kalina v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 11:12 am
The Civil War, rather than the founding - rather than Marbury v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 7:14 am
United States, 256 U.S. 335, 343 (1921) (Holmes, J.) [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 8:30 am
It was unconstitutional to retroactively apply Michigan’s Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) to a defendant who, at age 19, had pleaded guilty to a sex offense under a state diversionary statute, the Michigan Supreme Court has ruled.In People v Temelkoski, the Michigan Supreme Court emphasized that, when prosecuting crimes, the state must adhere to the promises it makes to defendants who waive their right to a jury trial and plead guilty to a criminal offense under… [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Quoting an article by Felix Frankfurter from 1916, and also citing Ernst Freund, Post states that Progressives had repudiated Lochner v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am
London Borough of Wandsworth v NJ [2013] EWCA Civ 1373NJ applied as homeless to Wandsworth. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am
London Borough of Wandsworth v NJ [2013] EWCA Civ 1373NJ applied as homeless to Wandsworth. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 9:38 am
Wheaton v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 2:04 pm
With respect, try telling that first to Eugene V. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Popular sovereignty meant, as Holmes argued, that even "tyrannical" laws should be upheld if they represented the wishes of legislative majorities. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:18 pm
Panayiotou v Waltham Forest and Smith v Haringey. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
Iacangelo v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
United States (1919) (majority and dissent of Holmes, J.) [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:33 am
[v]6. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 1:10 pm
As Justice Brandeis wrote in his canonical concurring opinion in Whitney v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
There is no doubt that Morrison v. [read post]