Search for: "State v. Hughes"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,956
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
In the case of Almeida Leitão Bento Fernandes v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 11:20 am
Graham v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 11:20 am
Graham v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 11:20 am
Graham v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 8:16 am
The previous leading authority on “white list” designation was R (Javed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] EWCA Civ 789. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 9:26 pm
The Supreme Court recently observed this challenge to patent claim interpretation, stating in Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 5:44 am
I spend the morning reading into Privy Council case of Hunte and another v The State, a miscarriage of justice case from Trinidad and Tobago that is starting next week. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In Burwell v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:03 pm
45835/05, § 68, 31 July 2012; Dammann v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:11 pm
Riner v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 9:53 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 6:38 am
State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 9:13 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 12:58 pm
Cir. 2015) Download Fenner v CellcoPanel: Newman (author), Schall, Hughes In Fenner v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:07 am
On 24 and 25 November 2014, the Supreme Court heard the case of R (Evans) v Her Majesty’s Attorney-General. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:01 am
[1] Arnold v Britton & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 902 (22 July 2013), para 45 [2] Ibid, para 50 [3] Ibid, para 57 [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 7:09 am
Suri v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am
In Greater Glasgow Health Board v Doogan & Anor [2014] UKSC 68, the Supreme Court considered the ambit of the right under s 4. [read post]
