Search for: "State v. Kent" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
Here's a course with an IPKat readers discount.Never Too Late 225[Week ending 9 Jun]Digging Designs - a six month review (& farewell) | Will Marvel Studios face copyright infringement claim for using Ghanaian kente designs in the Black Panther movie? [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am by John Elwood
Alabama, 16-7835 Issue: Whether a state court can enforce a rule that Brady v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary on yesterday’s grants comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:11 am by Anna Christensen
At ACSblog, Jody Kent (director of the Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth) and Beth Colgan (an attorney at the Institutions Project at Columbia Legal Services) praise last week’s decision in Graham v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:31 am by Steve Hall
The decision was an exception to the United States Supreme Court decision in April 2008 in Baze v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
From that it follows that it is impermissible to base state policies on claimsabout the divine will. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 2:52 am by Tom Donnelly
Michael Kent Curtis, No State Shall Abridge: The Fourteenth Amendment and the Bill of Rights. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:53 am
The Los Angeles Times continues the discussion over United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 7:04 pm
On Wednesday of this week, a conference on "The Future of Election and Ethics Reform in the States" will take place in Columbus, sponsored by Kent State University's Department of Political Science. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
English courts have stated more clearly that Art 8 does not protect corporate reputation (Euromoney Institutional Investor Plc v Aviation News Ltd at [20]), and also seem suspicious of the idea that it is protected by A1P1 (Ajinomoto Sweeteners V Asda Stores Ltd at [29]). [read post]