Search for: "State v. Land" Results 1081 - 1100 of 13,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2011, 2:48 pm by Jeremy
201 states as follows: “The provisions of Articles IV and V of this Chapter shall apply upon highways [...] [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 6:27 am
Supreme Court will take the Special Master's report and responses by the states into consideration and issue a final decision. [read post]
31 May 2016, 8:33 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Tuesday in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:15 am by Wen Xie
The issue of AI inventorship in the United States remains at large following the Supreme Court’s denial of cert in Thaler v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 6:30 am
Back in 1981, the High Court in Gazzo v Comptroller of Stamps (Vic) held that s.90 was not valid so far as it applied to transfers of land in Victoria, in attempting to prevent Victorian stamp duty being charged. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:42 pm by lennyesq
Dean Salkin joined with nine other law professors in an amicus brief to the NY Appellate Division, 3rd Dept. in Norse Energy v Town of Dryden. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:42 pm by lennyesq
Dean Salkin joined with nine other law professors in an amicus brief to the NY Appellate Division, 3rd Dept. in Norse Energy v Town of Dryden. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 5:05 pm by Patricia Salkin
The county was then required to make that determination and state in writing the facts and criteria on which it relied. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm by NARF
(Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act of 1974)United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 2:21 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Courts of Appeals Bulletin - find case summaries and links to source documents at:http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2014cta.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 8:57 am by Native American Rights Fund
United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:38 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
First, the State as owner of the submerged land adjacent to littoral property has the right to fill that land, so long as it does not interfere with the rights of the public and of littoral landowners. [read post]