Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 21,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
He went on to find that earlier pages in the sales process, including the full product details page, also targeted the UK, not least because that page stated “This item ships to the United Kingdom”. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 10:37 am
See Mark A. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:49 am
The Panel noted that Complainant “is …. recognized as the owner of a family of R US marks under the United States trademark law. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:29 am
Adidas sues Wolverine for infringement of adidas’ three strip mark. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 11:39 am
In its recent decision in State of Texas v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:43 pm
Erica VaccarelloBy the end of June, the US Supreme Court will have ruled on the registrability of scandalous and immoral marks in Iancu (USPTO) v Brunetti (No. 18-302). [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:24 am
On appeal, however, it was found that the mark had become distinctive, within the meaning of Article 7(3), in the German and English-speaking member states. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 1:22 am
United States v Arnold Decision (2006) In the NY Times story "Searching a computer", said Jennifer M. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 7:17 pm
Kipling Apparel Corp. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 4:26 am
" Wal-Mart, 529 U.S. at 212.Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 11:02 am
My source stated that he “probably would have let Huang v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm
This morning the Court announced its decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 8:06 pm
In contrast, there has not been any correspondingly focused attention on trade mark litigation, or indeed on other forms of trade mark dispute resolution. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Mark Baptist Church of Pittsburg v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:40 am
Fargo disclosed the use of a low frequency (LF) RFID tag, but stated this was only an example and noted that a more powerful (high frequency (HF)) tag could be used. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:24 am
Co. v Stein, 1 NY3d 416, 421 [2004] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:51 pm
AP is reporting that the State of Utah has made its mark in the States v Feds immigration controversy by passing a law similar to the Arizona Immigration Law with one huge exception. [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 8:01 am
Corp. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am
In this sense, the CJEU reasoned that paragraph 1 in that provision must be interpreted as allowing a court of a Member State to apply a convention concluded between a Member State of the EU and a non-member State before 1 January 1958 or, for States acceding to the EU, before the date of their accession, such as the Convention between Switzerland and Germany concerning the Reciprocal Protection of Patents, Designs and Trademarks, signed in Berlin on 13 April… [read post]
