Search for: "State v. Strange"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 2,180
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2018, 1:25 pm
After I posted my blog on the May 9, 2018 South Carolina Supreme Court opinion in SCDSS v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 9:05 am
This is the strange impulse of our ‘exceptionalism’, to always borrow something and modify it slightly, then declare the end result definitively, uniquely American. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:57 am
Strang, (2011) 21 B.L.R. (4th) 1 (B.C.S.C). as follows: I note in Bower v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:17 am
TarrowWhen, on June 24th, the Supreme Court effectively liquidated Roe v Wade, scholars of social movements and abortion rights shook their heads – but not in disbelief. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm
The Court rendered the decision, Jones v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 10:03 am
And, in Town of Greece v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:47 pm
It’s written somewhat strangely – weak at the beginning, strong at the end – but the Department of Justice’s amicus curiae brief , filed yesterday in Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:38 pm
The Ninth Circuit swung mightily and missed with McClellan v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:58 pm
Originally called Sun Microsystems Inc v M-Tech Data Ltd and another (noted by the IPKat here), the case of Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd and Lichtenstein was marked out by the IPKat as a thunderously bad decision when the Court of Appeal reversed the decision of Kitchin J at [2010] EWCA Civ 997. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:24 pm
Aviva Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:02 pm
Lord Neuberger, delivering the judgment of the Court, stated that whether a party was 'making' something was a "a matter of fact and degree". [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 6:39 am
What about an OHP’s report which specifically states that an employee is not disabled for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010? [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 4:46 am
Ct. 2653 (2011), protecting promotional communications as commercial speech; next, the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 1:03 am
A correspondent sent me the pdf of August 16 decision in Northrop Grumman v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Co., 881 S.W.2d 279, 284-85 (Tex. 1994); Strange v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:10 am
See Kiobel, et al. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 12:29 pm
But reconciling Concepcion and AmEx III could lead to some strange results. [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
’”Before the Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm
There is a strong case precedent for Judge Shore’s decision including the the strangely similar case of MacKinney v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:12 am
United States v. [read post]
