Search for: "State v. Vanness"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 3,481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2007, 10:49 pm
State, 652 So. 2d 344, 346 (Fla. 1995); Lightbourne v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:40 am
The absence of an arguable right under domestic law may not of itself have been determinative of the matter – the concept of a “civil right” is an autonomous one (Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v Belgium (1981) 4 EHRR 1). [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 11:25 am
Van Hook, ___ S. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:16 pm
The letter read in part: "Because you were a witness in the case of the People v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 1:10 pm
Yesterday, the European Union Court of Justice decided Centraal Israëlitisch Consistorie van België and Others v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:52 pm
Supp. 2d 362, 367 (E.D.N.Y. 2009), complete a multiple-step process of clicking non-obvious links, Van Tassell v. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 2:47 pm
The facts which led to the judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-193/04 Hans-Martin Tillack v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:08 pm
In A.T. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
As a matter of principle, Part I could be excluded if, on facts, the juridical seat is outside India or the law governing the arbitration agreement is a law other than Indian law , as was held in Union of India v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 7:00 am
After being released from state prison, Goldstein sued John Van de Kamp, who was the Los Angeles County DA when Goldstein was prosecuted. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 2:32 pm
(Michiel Poesen, KU Leuven) Persoonlijke identiteit v. nationale constitutionele identiteit: interactie tussen EU recht en internationaal privaatrecht (Hester Kroeze, UGent: Raad van State) Die beskerming van migrante kinders in internasionale privaatreg (Robin Cupido, Universiteit van Kaapstad) The Right to Freedom of Religion and Conscience: A Comparative Analysis of the Doctrine of Entanglement (Mathabo Baase, Universiteit van Kaapstad)… [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 7:48 am
First, plaintiffs argue that the provision fails the ambiguity test under Pennhurst State Sch. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
(See Matthews v Tufts, 87 NY 568, 570 [1882], citing Van Lieuw v Johnson, Ct App, Mar. 1871 [unreported].) [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
(See Matthews v Tufts, 87 NY 568, 570 [1882], citing Van Lieuw v Johnson, Ct App, Mar. 1871 [unreported].) [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:55 am
Adam Liptak of the New York Times has alerted me to an interesting decision issued yesterday by the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 8:23 am
Corp. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
Van Arsdall, and Davis v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:32 pm
The Court held that"The threshold issue in evaluating whether a resentence is vindictive is whether the resentence is more severe than that originally imposed" (People v Cahill, 46 AD3d 1455, 1456; see generally People v Young, 94 NY2d 171, 176-177, rearg denied 94 NY2d 876; People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 159-160), and a determinate sentence of 25 years is of course more severe than one of 20 years. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:45 am
Publications of disciplinary charges filed against the employee by the employee's attorneyHendrick Hudson CSD v Falinski, App. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 6:09 am
Michael Hellner, professor at Stockholm University, discussed several cases of the ECtHR (Ejimson v Germany) and the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) (K.A. v Belgium, Coman and S.M.). [read post]
