Search for: "Stephens v. State Bar" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,680
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2013, 4:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the case at bar, the testimony of the prosecution's expert began innocuously, as it was intended to help the jury understand the complainant's intellectual limitations in the aftermath of the crime similar to People v Carroll and People v Story. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Article 6 of the Civil Rights Law provides a formal procedure for changing a name, which provides the advantages of being speedy, definite and a matter of record as was done in Smith v United States. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 4:09 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Following this statement by the court clerk the defendant stated that he did not wish to challenge any allegation in the statement. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 2:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Neither stated that he or she was in the room when the alleged crimes took place. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
Nassau County Probate Lawyers, Nassau County Estate Litigation Lawyers or Nassau County Will Contest Lawyers at Stephen Bilkis & Associates are ready to help. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:31 pm
The court would like to reiterate that the undue influence concept speaks to the testator's state of mind at the time of the execution of the will. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Chiappari is a partner at Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke in New York City. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm by Don Cruse
” The Court held that agreement barred by the statute of frauds. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 3:44 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Kings County Marihuana Possession Lawyers or Kings County Cocaine Possession Lawyers at Stephen Bilkis and Associates are experts in these fields of law. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 12:15 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the People v Keindl this was issue along the alleged prejudice of the jury with the testimony of expert witness. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Based on People v Elufe, People v Fiumefreddo and People v Harris, to effectuate a valid guilty plea the defendant must enter the plea knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
  "This, in part, might reflect the common culture of law school course pedagogy, in which the utility of a course directed in the short term to the bar and in the middle term to the first job, is an important way that students weigh the value of a course (and therefore the amount of time that ought to be devoted to its mastery." [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 2:35 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Additionally, nowhere in the record did the defendant explicitly state that he waived his right to appeal. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 2:06 pm by Larry Tolchinsky
Supreme Court Opinion One week ago today, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in American Express v. [read post]