Search for: "T " Results 1081 - 1100 of 881,519
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2023, 5:00 am
STATUTE DOESN'T APPLY TO OCCUPANTS WHOSE RIGHTS HAVE ENDEDAfter he lost his condominium within the context of a foreclosure proceeding, a licensee holdover proceeding [pursuant to RPAPL 713(5)] was filed against T.C., to remove him from the premises.While the case got delayed in early 2020 due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and was stayed until January 2022 by T.C. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
When a personal-injury case was brought against them, the defendants moved for summary judgment – pretrial relief in their favor, claiming that the child didn’t suffer a “serious injury,” as defined by the state’s Insurance Law. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
 [4] Violations of A 19(2) are considered to be substantial procedural violations which led to a remittal of the case under A 111(1) and to the reimbursement of the appeal fee in several cases (see decisions T 251/88, T 939/91, T 382/92, T 476/95, T 838/02).[5] The Board is aware that in two of the cases mentioned above (T 251/88 and T 838/02), the boards asked the appellant or all parties whether they invoked the procedural… [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
Novelty as a ground for opposition was relied upon and discussed during the opposition proceedings and forms a major part of the decision under appeal (T 986/93 [2.4]).Furthermore, a Board of Appeal is at least not barred from considering a late-filed ground for opposition which has been disregarded by the OD pursuant to A 114(2), if it is of the opinion that the OD exercised its discretion wrongly in this respect (T 986/93 [headnote]). [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
When a claim relating to an electronic gaming apparatus defines as an integer a game rule which provides a further technical effect (which may be known) in the sense of decision T 1173/97, which technical effect is an inherent result of implementing the rule in the apparatus, should that integer be taken into account in assessing inventive step? [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
 I found it interesting to check what T 520/01 had to say on T 274/95:“[1.9] In Decision T 274/95 the circumstances may seem similar to those of the present case. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 1:45 pm
The Court of First Instance found in Joined Cases T-27/03, T-46/03, T-58/03, T-79/03, T-80/03, T-97/03, T-98/03 SP SpA and others v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 3:58 am by Sander van Rijnswou
T 789/07, Leitsatz 3).5.2 Die Tatsache, dass die neuen Merkmale in den ursprüng­lichen Ansprüchen nur in einem Anspruch auftauchten, den die Prüfungsabteilung als eine separate und mit der recherchierten Erfindung nicht einheitliche Erfindung angesehen habe, steht dieser Folgerung nicht entgegen.6. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In the present case the patent proprietor filed a request for re-establishment into the time limit for filing a notice of appeal.The factual situation was as follows (sorry for the length, but I find the modus operandi interesting):Mr Adrian F. had worked for 26 years in the law firm representing the appellant but had retired from the partnership on June 30, 2011. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 4:36 pm
"  But "proximate" and "proximity" are two different words, and don't necessarily mean the same thing despite the fact that one's an adjective of the other. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:57 pm by Joshua Wright
  From the AT&T press release: AT&T Inc. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:30 am
A recent survey shows that four in 10 law firms lack succession plans and nearly half of those asked who don’t have plans in place don’t plan on creating one. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 1:30 am by Sander van Rijnswou
The Board considers that the present case clearly differs from the case underlying decision T 784/06. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Thus, the principal issue to be answered by the Board of Appeal in inter partes procedures is to decide whether a first instance decision should be upheld or overturned (T 369/91 [6.6]). [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:49 pm by Myanna Dellinger
A group of 1L students recently caused a stir-up at an anonymous law school by posting an anonymous complaint after their criminal law professor wore a "Black Lives Matter" t-shirt "on campus" (not "to class," apparently). [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 8:36 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
From WTTW, via NACDL's news update: Illinois will become the first state in the nation to entirely eliminate cash bail after the Illinois Supreme Court upheld a contentious portion of the criminal justice reform law known as the SAFE-T Act... [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:47 am by Unreported Opinions
Real property — Foreclosure — Maryland Mortgage Fraud Protection Act This case arose from efforts by Capital One to collect a debt by initiating foreclosure proceedings against real estate that Mary T. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 4:16 am by immigrationprof
Taco Cid, a Mexican restaurant in South Carolina, is hawking T-shirts depicting “how to catch an illegal immigrant” — with traps using tacos as bait. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:34 am by Immigration Prof
The Trumps didn't realize that "Latinas Contra Trump" shirt translates to "Latinas Against Trump. [read post]