Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 49,482
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
In this vein, the recent Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) decision in Gitxaala Nation v Canada was heralded as a major legal victory for Indigenous peoples opposing the opposing the Enbridge pipelines and tankers proposal, and many hope that we are now on a pathway to put that risky project to rest for good. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:10 pm
So When I read Joan Cornow's characterization of it on her KauaiEclectic blog today in a post explaining her lack of sympathy for rich people I felt competent and compelled to offer a correction. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:00 am
Mazars/Trump v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:45 pm
Black (tribal disenrollment)* State Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2014state.htmlCases featured: People v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 2:47 pm
People don't do anything without reasons. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
In People v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:50 pm
Most people may be familiar with the term "common law marriage. [read post]
Case Law, Canada: Baglow v Smith, defence of “fair comment” succeeds in landmark blogging libel case
4 Mar 2015, 4:50 pm
Simpson; 2008 SCC 40, Grant v Torstar Corp , Grant 2009 SCC 61 and Crookes v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 12:10 pm
More than any other decision, Queen v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:00 pm
Musnuff v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:21 am
Sovereignty and Indigenous Peoples in North America. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:23 am
Justice Samuel Alito’s dissent from a denial of certiorari in Storman’s Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 2:35 pm
In Ghiselli v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 9:08 am
Here: The National Indian Law Library added new content to the Indian Law Bulletins on 9/12/19. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 12:44 pm
The Arizona Court of Appeals in the case of Amadore v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 12:48 pm
So, pursuant to California law, in 2022 he filed a motion to withdraw his plea, on the theory that he wouldn't have pled guilty if he knew he was subject to being deported as a result.The prosecution didn't oppose his motion, but the trial court denied it anyway. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm
" (People v Bergerson, 17 NY2d 398, 401 [1966]). [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 12:50 pm
So when Justice Huffman -- or the even-more-cell-phone-provider-challenged-than-I-am law clerk in his chambers -- repeatedly misspells that particular word in this opinion, it definitely caught my eye. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 1:18 pm
Given those facts, he could (and did) plausibly argue that his threats were no "so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat" as required by California law to support a criminal threat conviction.But then all I have to tell you are the background facts. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:34 pm
But that's only because of the Three Strikes Law and the fact he had been in prison three times previously.Still, it's an easier (and safer) crime than robbing a bank, eh? [read post]
