Search for: "The Travelers v. Mays" Results 1081 - 1100 of 9,144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2009, 12:16 pm
" However, on appeal the Appellate Division, 1st Department on May 7, 2009, declined to apply Shah's "impact rule" and instead chose to focus on whether the discriminatory action took place within New York, which was the reasoning applied in the federal district court in Rylott-Rooney v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 8:56 am by Kate Shaw
The most important choice may have been not to mount a challenge to the Court’s precedents in this area, including Smiley v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
While the arguably higher initial arbitration risk may contribute to concerns related to perception of bias, the results provide initial evidence that those criticisms may have been misattributed to ICSID. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 6:16 pm
While not specifically addressing the same fact pattern, Judge Posner's opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:01 am
 Which may well make a difference.At trial, this error may well be remedied. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
A cell phone punitive damages decision from back in December of 2015 has been brought to my attention in the form of Paszkowki v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 9:25 am
This Kat regrets that this case has travelled all the way to the US Supreme Court without anyone asking him about it at all, but he suspects that there may be many folk wandering around who think of little else. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Travelers Home and Marine Insurance, No. 53 WDA 2015, 2016 Pa. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 6:02 am
Yesterday's Indiana Court of Appeals decision in Travelers Casualty and Surety Co., et al. v. [read post]