Search for: "Thomas Connor"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2007, 2:32 pm
Last week, Justice Scalia was at Thomas Jefferson School of Law in San Diego to give a talk on the use of foreign law in U.S. constitutional decisions. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 5:52 am
Justice Clarence Thomas still seems angry about his confirmation hearings. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 3:29 pm
Panelist Information: Craig Ball, litigator and EDD consultant, Austin Thomas Gelbmann, principal, Gelbmann & Associates, Roseville, Mn. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 11:27 am
Presented live on August 2, 2007, the Law.com Webinar "2007 Socha-Gelbmann Survey" with panelists Craig Ball, Thomas Gelbmann, Tom O'Connor, and Moderator Monica Bay, Editor-in-Chief, Law Technology News, is now available for playback. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 12:16 am
By Tom O'Connor, Law Technology News Every August, we look forward to George Socha and Thomas Gelbmann's annual electronic-data-discovery survey, for several reasons. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 9:31 am
" (Perhaps Justice Thomas is on to something.) [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 1:40 pm
In the former category are Justices Blackmun, Powell, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy and Souter. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 5:59 pm
I think Justice O'Connor sets the bar. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 5:01 am
Said Judge Connor? [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 2:31 pm
" Paul Greenberg of Tribune Media Services writes here that the ruling in the race cases represents an end to the "mindless muddle that characterized the O'Connor court. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 8:03 am
In reality, why did the Senate confirm Justice Thomas (or Justices Louis Brandeis, Thurgood Marshall, and Sandra Day O’Connor before him)? [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 3:22 am
After yesterday you might even say a 6 million dollar difference.While Justice Sandra Day O'Connor was penning the majority decision in Jackson , then Chief Justice Rehnquist and current Justices Scalia and Kennedy were signing onto the vigorous dissent of Justice Clarence Thomas that the majority was "creating remedies out of whole cloth" and "substituting its policy judgments for the bargains struck by Congress as reflected in the statute's text. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 8:31 am
As a replacement for O'Connor, a centrist who voted to uphold abortion rights and affirmative action, he would probably move the court's overall balance to the right. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 5:33 am
One might argue that Justices Scalia and Thomas engage in such derision only when the Constitution doesn't answer a particular constitutional question. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
The only relevant change was Alito for O'Connor. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
The only relevant change was Alito for O'Connor. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 6:58 am
That is good news for people who were worried that all affirmative action policies were now in danger following Justice O'Connor's retirement. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 5:48 pm
The Court's five more conservative members (which then consisted of the late Chief Justice Rehnquist, former Justice O'Connor, and Justices Scalia, Kennedy and Thomas) together prevailed in five cases. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 10:46 am
As of now, only Justice Thomas has taken a strong anti-disclosure position. 5. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 6:55 am
Kennedy is more conservative than O'Connor was on a number of issues. [read post]
