Search for: "Thomas v. State"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 15,499
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2023, 4:59 am
In 2003 in Grutter v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:04 pm
A very similar case is pending before a three-judge-panel in Georgia – Georgia State Conf. of the NAACP v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 12:25 pm
Justice Thomas’ dissent noted that the majority’s decision was a pyrrhic victory for the defendant because the plaintiff could turn around and sue in state court, where Article III standing limits do not apply. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:14 am
Connecticut (contraception,) Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:59 am
Schutte v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:03 pm
ShareCivil rights plaintiffs scored a significant victory in Health & Hospital Corp. of Marion County v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
In Allen v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 5:36 pm
The post SCOTUS Decides Jack Daniel's v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 3:36 pm
At least in the context of numbers of one race v. another race in a district, regardless of the shape of the district, states may have to take into account the total percentage of a minority and make sure their redistricting does not dilute that race's voting power. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm
The post Justice Thomas's Dissent in Health and Hospital Corp. of Marion County v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am
Board of Education, the landmark civil rights case out of that state. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:33 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:29 am
Before the United States Supreme Court handed down its recent 8-to-1 decision in Glacier Northwest v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:19 am
S., at 944 (opinion of THOMAS, J.). [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:34 am
United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:06 am
United States, No. 22-10. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:07 pm
The court ruled that under new US Supreme Court precedent from New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:56 am
Doe * Justice Thomas Really, REALLY Wants Section 230 Repealed (Even If He Has to Do It Himself) * Section 230 Immunizes TikTok for User-Posted Videos–Day v. [read post]
