Search for: "Tom Goldstein" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,130
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2007, 4:23 am
  "Once people make it to the Supreme Court, we don't tend to lose them," said Tom Goldstein, who heads the Supreme Court practice of Washington law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld.The case had been watched across the country and potentially could have affected thousands of criminal defendants and a growing backlog of cases awaiting resolution of the issue. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 1:00 pm
  First, Tom Goldstein here, rethinking his prior authorship prediction, now says Justice Breyer is likely "writing at least one of the opinions in the sentencing cases. [read post]
23 May 2007, 8:46 pm
Baker Advanced Marketing Techniques Tom Pick The WebMarketCentral Blog Tina Lang-Stuart Bryan Eisenberg Jeffrey Eisenberg Robert Gorell and the rest of the team at Grok Dot Com Michele Miller WonderBranding Publicity Ship Blog The Media Slut Brad Shorr Word Sell Sasha Where Business Meets the Web Ellee Seymour ProActivePR Chris Kenton The Marketers' Consortium Paul Young Product Beautiful By Ron Miller Michael Morton James D. [read post]
22 May 2007, 1:03 pm
In the this post and its comments, Tom Goldstein speculates that Justice Stevens is writing the opinion for the Court in Claiborne and Rita. [read post]
21 May 2007, 6:25 pm
Over at SCOTUS Blog, Tom Goldstein wonders what would happen to the Supreme Court if a Republican were to win the presidency in 2008: As a consequence, whether the Court moves more fundamentally to the right, so that it could genuinely undo the jurisprudence of the Warren Court, depends on the next President. [read post]
21 May 2007, 4:24 pm
(Tom Goldstein's post analyzing the effect of the 2008 election on the Supreme Court is available here.) [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:05 pm
Tom Goldstein has a very provocative post up at SCOTUSBlog on how the 2008 Presidential Election might change the direction of Supreme Court doctrine. [read post]
19 May 2007, 9:52 am
"  And, though the Court has long avoided a long-established split concerning this exception and juvenile adjudications, a new cert petition filed by SCOTUS gurus Jeff Fisher and Tom Goldstein would seem to present the Court with a great opportunity to return to these important issues. [read post]
19 May 2007, 9:27 am
Thanks to How Appealing, I see two great reads for SCOTUS watchers: Tom Goldstein at SCOTUSblog has this post which looks at how the 2008 presidential election could impact SCOTUS. [read post]
19 May 2007, 2:17 am
Ackerman agrees, but argues that what was crucial was that the American public in the 1936 election self consciously sought and approved of constitutional transformation.Which brings us back to Tom Goldstein's post. [read post]
18 May 2007, 9:00 pm
" Tom Goldstein has this post at "SCOTUSblog. [read post]
16 May 2007, 7:08 pm
" Tom Goldstein has this post at "SCOTUSblog. [read post]
7 May 2007, 8:22 am
Note: This is the second in a series of posts written by Tom Goldstein, with research by Jason Harrow, regarding the state of the Court at "Mid-Term. [read post]
5 May 2007, 7:46 am
Over at SCOTUSblog, there are great posts from Tom Goldstein and David Stras dissecting the Supreme Court's ever-shrinking docket. [read post]
4 May 2007, 1:55 pm
As a commenter pointed out, Tom Goldstein, the head of Akin Gump's Supreme Court practice, just posted an "opening" for a "special assistant. [read post]
4 May 2007, 10:17 am
"Job Opening: Special Assistant to Tom Goldstein. [read post]
4 May 2007, 9:05 am
If you are contemplating law school but would like to first work in the legal world for two years, or if you are currently (or planning to be) a part-time law student in the DC area, Akin Gump is currently accepting applications for the position of special assistant to Tom Goldstein (UPDATE: the new person will also be working with me, as I'll still be contributing full time here). [read post]
3 May 2007, 7:02 pm
Over at SCOTUSBlog, Tom Goldstein had an excellent post Tuesday about the state of the Supreme Court's plenary docket for October Term 2007. [read post]