Search for: "UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 59,591
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2010, 1:23 pm
The Judicial Conference of the United States recently approved several changes regarding public access to federal court records on PACER. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:59 am
Additionally, it concluded that, although the federal law prohibits the federal government from mandating the use of E-Verify, it does not prohibit states from doing so. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 2:24 pm
United States 23-219Issue: Whether, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Platts LNG Daily reports that officials with the Japanese government hope to secure support from Canada and the United States for the export of LNG from North America to Japan. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 10:53 am
That was the question of United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:45 pm
Section 1498(a) provides that the the Court of Federal Claims is the forum to redress unauthorized use of a patent “by or for the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 1:25 pm
A successful assertion of this authority would herald the ascension of an agency with greater power and broader reach than any regulator in the federal government. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 10:24 am
” Under United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:07 am
Last week, the Department of Justice announced a settlement between the United States, the state of Tennessee, and AmMed Direct LLC for $18 million. [read post]
8 May 2015, 2:12 pm
Starting Monday, the United States' human rights record will be subject to international scrutiny by the U.N. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:30 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:19 am
United States Postal Service (Supreme Court 2019) [Return Mail, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 9:08 am
Federal Income taxes! [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 10:00 pm
In a recent dispute, the United States argued that the Court of Federal Claims lacked jurisdiction to review any disputes concerning Other Transaction Authority (OTA) agreements, and that it is “conceivable” that no court had authority to review such arrangements. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
United States [SCOTUSblog backgrounder] that prosecution under the federal government's anti-bank fraud statute [text] does not require proof that a defendant intended to defraud a financial institution. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 10:00 pm
In a recent dispute, the United States argued that the Court of Federal Claims lacked jurisdiction to review any disputes concerning Other Transaction Authority (OTA) agreements, and that it is “conceivable” that no court had authority to review such arrangements. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 10:00 pm
In a recent dispute, the United States argued that the Court of Federal Claims lacked jurisdiction to review any disputes concerning Other Transaction Authority (OTA) agreements, and that it is “conceivable” that no court had authority to review such arrangements. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 10:00 pm
In a recent dispute, the United States argued that the Court of Federal Claims lacked jurisdiction to review any disputes concerning Other Transaction Authority (OTA) agreements, and that it is “conceivable” that no court had authority to review such arrangements. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 10:00 pm
In a recent dispute, the United States argued that the Court of Federal Claims lacked jurisdiction to review any disputes concerning Other Transaction Authority (OTA) agreements, and that it is “conceivable” that no court had authority to review such arrangements. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 10:00 pm
In a recent dispute, the United States argued that the Court of Federal Claims lacked jurisdiction to review any disputes concerning Other Transaction Authority (OTA) agreements, and that it is “conceivable” that no court had authority to review such arrangements. [read post]
