Search for: "United States v. Borders"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 3,812
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2017, 4:39 pm
Key among these cases is the Supreme Court’s 1993 decision in Sale v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:46 pm
United States and Kahn v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 4:41 am
Last week in United States of America v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:03 am
Thein The Supreme Court of the United States held in Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 7:15 am
Gersh v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 1:01 am
United States, 335 F.3d 652, 658 (7th Cir.2003); Bazuaye v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:28 pm
As we said in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:51 pm
Period of admission: A Y-1 worker can be admitted for a two year period that can be renewed twice if that worker spends a period of one year outside the United States between each admission. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 12:51 am
In Jabri v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 12:51 am
In Jabri v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:39 pm
Microsoft appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.The court of appeals noted that, unless Congress explicitly states otherwise, it is presumed that a statute's reach is limited to the borders of the United States. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 5:22 am
§ 1158(a)(1), which establishes the threshold eligibility for asylum of “any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival)" (emphasis added). [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
DOMA and United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 10:07 am
Maybe in his next life Balderas can try harder to be born in the right place so his quest to better himself won’t threaten to bring down the entire United States legal system. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 5:57 am
The US Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:49 am
’ United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 9:13 am
In any event, the consent judgment includes $600k payment to Square Enix, so yes, the infringers WILL think twice about doing this again.In another press release dated Feb. 12, 2008, the lawsuit was noted to have been filed and was "a result of cooperation with the United States Department of Homeland Security and Customs and Border Patrol, whose agents seized a crate of counterfeit replica swords. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:23 pm
The court held that the Regulations left no room for doubt that the ruling of a home Member State should be recognised and given effect elsewhere and, accordingly, a ruling in winding-up proceedings by an EEA member state should, to the extent that the ruling was final and binding in that country, be recognised and given effect in the United Kingdom. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 5:00 pm
It is also broadly consistent with the Supreme Court's June 2023 8-1 decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
As the Supreme Court noted in DHS v. [read post]
