Search for: "United States v. Childs" Results 1081 - 1100 of 8,780
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2011, 5:32 am by Joel R. Brandes
Respondent contended ICARA authorizes United States district courts "to order the return of a child to the country of habitual residence upon a finding of wrongful removal. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:47 pm
The father then returned to the foreign country and was unable to obtain a visa to come back to the United States. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm by NARF
United States (Treaty Rights; "Bad Men" Provision) Reges v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:54 pm by NARF
United States Department of the Interior (Mineral Royalties; State Intervention) Alturas Indian Rancheria v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
However, that Act does not apply to Bermuda, because Bermuda is not a part of the United Kingdom (whatever the Convention might say). [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 1:36 pm by Joel R. Brandes
On July 28, 2015, exactly one year after the date that her second child traveled to the United States, petitioner filed an application under the Hague Convention. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 3:03 am by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 10 people die every day in the United States due to “unintentional drowning. [read post]
26 May 2018, 1:52 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In April 2012, Kang and the twins relocated to the United States while Ogawa remained in Japan. [read post]
29 May 2024, 2:09 pm by NARF
Jennifer Odegard (Indian Child Welfare Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2024.html In re JCR II/JCR/JCR/JCR, Minors (Indian Child Welfare Act) U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:26 am
United States Department of Health and Human Services, et. al.) has struck down a key portion of DOMA, saying that for the federal government to deny legally married, same-sex couples health benefits is unconstitutional. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 11:01 pm by Orin Kerr
The delay question came up in passing in Footnote 3 of United States v. [read post]