Search for: "United States v. David" Results 1081 - 1100 of 6,862
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2016, 2:40 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court granted review in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 3:22 pm
In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in favor of the plaintiffs who were suing New Haven, Connecticut in the Ricci v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 1:51 pm
After the announcement that David Kappos was nominated for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), there has been much speculation about possible reform programs that Kappos may enact. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:13 am by Andrew Hamm
United States and argues that “[w]hat’s at stake in this case is whether the justices will… make it easier for prosecutors to pursue certain types of insider trading claims. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
(collectively, “MadStad”) filed suit against the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”), its then director, David Kappos, in his official capacity, and the United States of America (collectively, “the Government”) in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Frederick Schauer is David and Mary Harrison Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Virginia. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:37 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a double jeopardy case, comes from Rory Little for this blog. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
United States and Free Exercise after Fulton, 75 Ala. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 3:01 pm by Joe Patrice
United States, Career Advice, CATO Institute, Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, Clarence Thomas, David Y. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:47 am by Anna Christensen
United States, a mandatory-minimum case which has been consolidated with Abbott v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 4:03 am by Benjamin Wittes
These elements have been largely endorsed by higher courts, such as by the UK Supreme Court in RB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and OO v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10. [read post]