Search for: "United States v. Guest"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 2,340
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2015, 10:00 am
”Yesterday, the Eleventh Circuit issued a decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Maple Drive Farms v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
There was still no infringement or passing off so far as SCRABBLE v SCRAMBLE was concerned, however. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
This is a big question, taking into account the litigation of Cuban trade marks in the United States [Only accepted in TTAB proceedings: see "TTABlog Guest Comment: Marty Schwimmer on TTAB's "CUBITA" Summary Judgment Under The Pan American Convention"]. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 10:57 pm
Here is Paul and Randi’s guest post. **************************************** They may be based in North Korea, Russia, China, or the United States. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 5:59 am
Furthermore, the EEOC frivolously sought back pay and reinstatement, although it should have known that Global no longer had approval to provide guest workers and that many of the workers were not lawfully within the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:23 am
FEC & and McCutcheon v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 2:41 pm
As Justice McReynolds famously said in Pierce v Society of Sisters 268 US 510 (1925), at 535, “The child is not the mere creature of the State”. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 11:33 am
The district court agreed, concluding that based on relevant precedents from the United States Supreme Court (in Clapper v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:36 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 9:29 am
United States, 527 U.S. 373, 380-381 (1999) (interpreting 18 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:21 pm
(Hamburger has guest-blogged right here: see this post, this one, and this one. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
* The IPKat weblog and the European Patent Office: some points of clarificationMerpel and you need to talk.* Offering a service is not use in commerce Under Lanham Act, says Federal Circuit Court Blogger and recent guest Kat Marie-Andrée Weiss explains the ruling in David Couture v Playdom, a Federal Circuit's decision that highlights a difference of approach between the trade mark law of the United States and that of the European Union as regards… [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 10:51 am
The case that forms the subject of this guest blog from Katfriend, blogger and recent guest Kat Marie-Andrée Weiss is one that immediately caught the IPKat's attention since his first thought was to ask whether it highlights a difference of approach between the trade mark law of the United States and that of the European Union. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:14 am
LG Electronics[5] and Bowman v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 9:02 am
But this is not so, as this guest post by Kevin Winters suggests. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
United States, involving threats made on social media. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:54 pm
The city claims that there are over a hundred “similar” ordinances or statutes across the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:16 am
The pending Supreme Court case King v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
So begins the Conclusion of the United States District Court, Southern District of California, Central Division in the case of Méndez v. [read post]
