Search for: "United States v. Holder" Results 1081 - 1100 of 4,280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The development of this business model has troubled the Courts in the United States and the United Kingdom. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
”Over 500 cases have cited Mezei with approval, including the Ninth Circuit, which quoted it in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 12:32 pm by Florian Mueller
Two weeks after the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its opinion in Alice v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 9:09 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
May 30, 2012), the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey answered this question in the affirmative. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 9:12 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
May 30, 2012), the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey answered this question in the affirmative. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:44 am
The lawyers argue that even when false marking doesn't cause any "proprietary injury," it still has a negative effect on the United States, "which suffers injury to its sovereignty arising from violation of its laws. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 11:20 am by Josh H. Escovedo
Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. has petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States for certiorari following an unfavorable ruling from the Ninth Circuit in the matter of VIP Products LLC v. [read post]
Amazon’s APEX program allows patent holders to have their patents examined by a neutral third-party patent examiner, rather than the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]