Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 4,280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm
Supreme Court described it in Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm
Several patent-related cases, Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
Mendez in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
Mendez in U.S. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:54 am
Three relevant quotes from SEC v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:53 am
Cox, the privately owned subsidiary of Cox Enterprises, provides digital cable television, and telecommunications services in the United States, has more than 4 million subscribers and relied on the 'safe harbor' defence in US law.Whilst BMG acknowledged Cox had policies in place to deal with users who repeatedly infringed copyrights, it accused Cox of failing to implement it's own policies and argued that this meant the ISP should be denied safe harbor… [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 9:20 am
Still another reason for the drop in the number of patent infringement lawsuits may be the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Octance Fitness v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
Jonathan Masur – "The outcome in Oil States provides a possibly counter-intuitive answer as to whether panel stacking by the PTO director will remain permissible. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
The post Mohawk Tribe v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
The post Mohawk Tribe v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am
United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:54 pm
For example, in VantagePoint Venture Partners 1996 v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
Kentucky, the Supreme Court ruled that failure of a defense attorney to inform a client that a collateral consequence of their felony plea could lead to the client’s (in this case, a forty-year permanent resident in the United States) deportation constituted deficient performance by the attorney.[8] Two years later, in Missouri v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:02 pm
Money transmitter regulation in the U.S. is separate from federal money services business registration, and is governed on a state-by-state basis. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm
United States Postal Service, No. 17-1594 (Whether the government is a “person” who can petition to institute a CBM; Does a 1498(a) action count as an infringement action?) [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 11:50 am
II, defined to include “all persons who can be said to hold an office under the government” in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:41 am
Accordingly, Congress could not have meant to prevent domestic copyright holders from enforcing their rights against foreign broadcasters who transmit infringing performances into the United States. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:59 am
These expensive and potentially efficiency-reducing measures are not installed in the United States (though here there are other more “standard” precautions). [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
Gibson v. [read post]
