Search for: "United States v. Means"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 29,954
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2015, 5:20 am
Background In United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 2:14 pm
United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:48 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
"Finding that under the Public Authorities Law §2(1) and (2)(a), a "public benefit corporation" such as ECMCC is included under the definitions for both a "state authority" and a "local authority," the Appellate Division ruled that ECMCC is an "authority" within the meaning of both the Public Authorities Law and the County Rules, thus constituting a separate layoff unit within the County.Holding that "[A]n… [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:29 am
Is such “contracting out” of services a mandatory subject of collective bargaining within the meaning of the Taylor Law? [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:40 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:20 am
The Supreme Court of the United States will take up this question this term in the context of North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 5:25 pm
United States (2019) The Supreme Court handed down its decision in Gamble vs. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 6:40 pm
" Note 3 states that in such a scenario, the "loss shall include the amount paid" for the items in question. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 10:58 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm
(quoting Mozes v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 4:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 7:34 am
This is another ruling involving Trump’s efforts to kick TikTok and WeChat out of the United States. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 2:30 pm
Photo credit: A bag of money and gavel represent many legal expenses // ShutterStockThe SPEECH Act combats libel tourism, the process of trying to enforce an international defamation ruling in the United States if the ruling isn’t consistent with U.S. law. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 9:42 am
State makes clear, a conviction can also mean deportation for non-citizens. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
This question is at the core of the case of Sufi and Elmi v United Kingdom, in which the Strasbourg Court has ruled that the state of chaos prevailing in Somalia is so dire that repatriation there would amount to a breach of the prohibition on torture and inhuman treatment under Article 3. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 10:57 am
United States, 458 F.3d 1345, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 6:53 am
Indigo Systems Corp., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 16-1945, 12 July 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:58 am
Rooke, LLC, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, No. 18-5068, 20 September 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
