Search for: "United States v. Michigan" Results 1081 - 1100 of 3,728
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2023, 7:51 am by Haley Proctor
Yesterday’s unsealed opinion in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:47 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, former Michigan governor John Engler urges the Court to grant cert. in Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:23 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-6355, concerning the proper application of the categorical analysis in Shepard v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm by Record on Appeal
Royal Dutch Petroleum – an Alien Tort Statute case involving a violation of the law of nations and whether a corporation can be a defendant in an Alien Tort Statute action;  United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 11:05 am by WIMS
The United States and GE both walked away from the 1991 Action knowing they would likely meet again; GE did not concede liability and the United States reserved its right to pursue additional recovery costs at a later date. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Eric Lomazoff's important new book, Reconstructing the National Bank Controversy, is the first scholarly study that views the National Bank controversy as a continuous 55-year sequence of events, whose highlights include the adoption of Alexander Hamilton's proposed Bank of the United States in 1791, John Marshall's decision in McCulloch v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 7:37 pm by Jeffrey M. Goldstein
June 17, 2019 Name of Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Short Case Name: Tim Hortons v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 2:55 pm by CAFE
 REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Vote for Stay Tuned with Preet, Webby AwardsUnited States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 9:36 am
" The Appeals Court affirmed the decision and said, "There is no improper delegation to the EPA (compare United States v. [read post]