Search for: "United States v. Miranda" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
United States — in which a splintered majority of the Supreme Court held that the CWA does not regulate all wetlands. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
That remarkable behavior is constitutional pursuant to the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
" We acknowledge that it is permissible to impeach a defendant at trial based upon his pre-arrest, pre-Miranda silence. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:18 pm
Congress may, by statute, dictate the foreign policy of the United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 3:45 am
The MBTA has announced an event last Tuesday which ended in the arrest of Jose V. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Green, No. 06-2468 Conviction for distribution of cocaine is vacated and remanded for a new trial where: 1) the written statement of a confidential informant naming defendant as the person who had sold him drugs in a controlled buy was hearsay and not subject to an exception as a present-sense impression; 2) the prosecution could not use in its case-in-chief as substantive evidence the responses and reactions of defendant upon seeing a video purporting to depict him selling drugs, when the showing… [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:25 am by Steve Bainbridge
This despite the fact that the SOB is an American citizen arrested in the United States. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  So this brings up two central questions: First, is it true that a Herculean justice, seeking unequivocal “right answers” to the questions posed by the United States Constitution, will feel forced by her oath of office to recognize a strong protection for the “right to keep and bear arms”? [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:52 am by Ryan Emenaker
The Court-Congress dialogue started in 1966, when the Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:46 am by Jeff Gamso
There has to be room to say, Never before, but now.The court's opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-29, have now been rescheduled three times. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Liddell, No. 07-1337 In a prosecution for being a felon in possession of a firearm, denial of a motion to suppress a post-arrest statement made without the warnings required by Miranda is affirmed where the arresting officers' in-custody questioning fell within the public safety exception to Miranda established in New York v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:27 am by Maxwell Kennerly
It could spend a whole decade doing nothing but affirming appeals of cases initially filed in the United States District Court for the District of Guam. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
" Consequently, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a "felony drug offense," even if state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:37 am by Conor McEvily
Hopwood notes that Paul Clement’s use of the phrase “unprecedented and unbounded” in his brief for the ACA challengers echoes a phrase used by the Chief Justice in the Court’s opinion in United Haulers Association, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:28 pm
Opinion below (8th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply __________________ Docket: 08-479 Title: Safford United School District #1 v. [read post]