Search for: "United States v. Rodriguez"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2008, 3:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 3:02 pm
Rodriguez). [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 12:55 pm
The court in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 10:34 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:22 pm
(See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 5:06 pm
United States, 151 U.S. 396 (1894)). [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 10:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:53 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rowan, No. 05-30536 On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, a 60-month sentence of supervised release following a conviction for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) defendant's sentence is a non-Guideline sentence since it falls outside the applicable range and was not based on an allowed departure; but 2) in light of the deferential standard set forth in Gall, there was no significant procedural error in the sentencing decision. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 7:46 pm
It also demands that with regard to "reverse Batson" challenges, the defense speaks with one voice, as illustrated in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:35 am
Rodriguez may make this point. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 8:29 pm
" See United States v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:09 am
The decision came on a 7-2 vote in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 3:04 am
The Supreme Court reversed, holding that the "maximum term of imprisonment . . . prescribed by law" for the state drug convictions at issue includes state recidivist enhancements, which in this case was a ten-year maximum. [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:47 pm
Applying United States v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 1:55 pm
United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 2:29 pm
C.A.A.F. has issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 2:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 1:31 pm
I'm writing an analysis of CAAF's opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
Henkel, 180 U.S. 109, 122 (1901) (rights available to one charged with criminal offense in the United States not applicable to offenses committed outside the United States against the laws of another country); Glucksman v. [read post]
