Search for: "United States v. State of Washington" Results 1081 - 1100 of 9,039
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2011, 6:26 am by Nabiha Syed
United States, in which the state has asked it to overturn the lower courts’ decisions blocking enforcement of four provisions of its controversial immigration law, S.B. 1070. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
In January 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:50 am
This is not a bankruptcy case, but it will be applicable in many large bankruptcy cases involving allegations of fraud by shareholders or investors.On January 15, 2008, the United States Supreme Court entered an important decision in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 8:44 am by Steven Cohen
  In re: William and Myo Shears – United States District Court – Western District of Washington – January 4th, 2016 – This is an admiralty litigation involving a fire on a motor yacht. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 8:55 am
The United States Supreme Court issued three opinions today: India Mission v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am by Kiran Bhat
The Court also released an opinion yesterday in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 7:04 pm
United States, 66 M.J. 114 (C.A.A.F. 2008). [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:07 am by Erin Miller
United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The constitutional protection the state receives in Chapter 9 bankruptcy regarding its sovereignty to organize its internal political units effectively subsidizes its decisions to favor suburban jurisdictions at the expense of central cities or any local government unit whose fiscal position is undermined by the state allowing competing subdivisions to form on its periphery. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 9:01 pm
United States (06-1456), on whether the federal money laundering statute requires an attempt to create the appearance of legitimate wealth. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:18 am by david
United States (No. 11-182), the state’s appeal of an  April 2011 opinion by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that blocked implementation of several key provisions in the law popularly known at “S.B. 1070. [read post]