Search for: "United States v. Stevens" Results 1081 - 1100 of 4,055
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm by Toby Heytens
PSKS, Inc.) and, of course, campaign finance (Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 9:20 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Well it may be, but they need to be aware of this case from the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 11:27 am
At Tuesday’s oral argument in United Student Aid Funds v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 5:35 am
Not content to widen doctrines on the margins, Justice Stevens' majority opinion blazed a new path through the law of standing and unearthed newfound regulatory authority for the United States Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 4:06 pm
The Court's order reads: "The application to vacate the stay entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on December 29, 2006, presented to Justice Stevens and by him referred to the Court, is denied. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:22 am by Howard Friedman
In New Jersey, a superseding criminal complaint (full text) was issued yesterday in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 9:10 pm by Peter Tillers
One of the landmark cases in which such requirements were affirmed, Crawford v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:01 am by Buckingham
On June 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court overruled the “physical presence” bright-line rule for substantial nexus in its landmark decision South Dakota v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:00 am by Bonnie Park
  In May 2001, Plaintiffs registered the updated design copyright with the United States Copyright Office. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Conor McEvily
’”  At the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Steven D. [read post]
4 May 2010, 8:51 am by Anna Christensen
Supreme Court’s holding nearly two hundred years ago in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 9:01 am
[See here for Steven Seidenberg’s analysis of this case and of other judicial interpretations of the state sovereign immunity as it relates to intellectual property rights.]In Georgia v. [read post]