Search for: "Word v. U. S"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 2,169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2007, 10:11 pm
Fred Thompson] as someone we could work with" and gave to his campaigns, but they can't be pleased by his kind words for Texas malpractice-suit curbs [Washington Post, Lattman; disclaimer] Pace U. student arrested on hate crime charges after desecrating Koran stolen from college [Newsday; Volokh, more; Hitchens] Little-used Rhode Island law allows married person to act as spouse's attorney, which certainly has brought complications to the divorce of Daniel… [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:28 am
The facts in Shapiro v Ettenson, 2015 NY Slip Op 31670(U) [Sup Ct NY County Aug. 16, 2015], are fairly simple. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 11:31 am
In other words, “the plaintiff must allege that a well-recognized duty owed under state law was breached by a manufacturer’s conduct that violates the FDCA. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:21 am
SPBA’s petition set out two causes of action: 1. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Doe, Olivas v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:23 pm
In many ways, today’s ruling in Rose Mary Knick v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:59 pm
Schwimmer, 279 U. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 9:17 am
In other words, the pro-federalism rhetoric of the Cato Institute in Comstock may come back to haunt them in McDonald v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 4:59 am
(She granted the “defendant’s” motion, which I assume was Wadsworth’s.) [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 2:32 pm
Stevens v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 4:40 am
See, e.g., Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:53 pm
Washington, 466 U. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:52 pm
Washington, 466 U. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:03 am
This decision should ensure that Canada’s copyright children have finally come of age.Anyway, don’t take my word for any of this about the mandatory tariff theory. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 4:49 am
Ward, 140 U. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
"); Braten v. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
In other words, the outbound investment regime will avoid the often- lengthy CFIUS review process—U.S. investments in China beginning in 2025 will fall under three categories: (i) prohibited; (ii) require notification; or (iii) permitted (with no further process required under the outbound investment regulation). [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 3:15 pm
Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Balkin, Law, Music, and Other Performing Arts, 139 U. [read post]
