Search for: "dev"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,596
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2018, 11:18 am
Twin Cities Dev., 45,634 (La. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm
DEV. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 7:56 am
Dept. of Labor & Workforce Dev. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 4:48 am
Dev., LLC v 23 E. 39th St. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 1:55 pm
Isley, 19 N.C. (2 Dev. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 7:53 am
Such speculation also fails to make the requisite showing to reform the stipulation on the ground that it was executed under a mutual or unilateral mistake (see M.S.B Dev. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 1:37 pm
Dev Sec Ops finally getting attention – as we move to world of continuous integration and deployment, incorporating security as early as possible will be critical and this means with the developers. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:05 pm
Dept. of Housing & Urban Dev., 717 F.2d 929, 931 (4th Cir. 1983) (quoting Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 5:17 pm
Despite the short obligatory tech problems, we got off to a roaring presentation, launched by Alvidas Jasin (right), biz dev director at Thompson Hine. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:59 pm
” Dev. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:48 pm
Dev. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 10:53 am
Dev. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:35 am
’” Mystic Isle Dev. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:16 pm
up to Virginia Beach to see Nan and Pops, though the festivities this year were somewhat dampened (literally and figuratively) by thunderstorms that spanned Virginia and North Carolina… and the start of Summer Session II classes this past Tuesday Class this week plus that trip plus the preceding week helping with NCCU Law‘s Legal Eagle Law Camp was the reason for my most recent extended hiatus from the blawgosphere.1 The Law Camp in particular was an interesting experience that… [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 9:28 am
You can learn more about that via the Bing Dev Center and associated MSDN documentation. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 5:40 pm
Representative of other cases where courts have refused to follow the positional risk rule, but have nevertheless found an increased risk of injury is the case of Restaurant Dev. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 8:49 pm
—===— From the law:/dev/null competition-related archives: Going out on a W (04/01/12) [this post] Greetings from Washington (briefly)! [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:17 pm
Dev. [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:48 am
The court refused, holding that the Kraffts did not subjectively know they had no viable trade secrets, apparently relying on the two-prong bad-faith test of “objective speciousness” and “subjective misconduct” first used in California federal court in Stilwell Dev. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 5:22 am
Dev., LLC v 23 E. 39th St. [read post]
