Search for: "-VMM Brown v. Heard"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,438
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 am
The Board heard evidence that Dr. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:57 pm
On April 19, 2011, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in American Electric Power Company v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:09 pm
How about, oh, Brown v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:06 am
In an op-ed for the Christian Science Monitor, Megan Brown describes the case as “novel, and far more aggressive and disruptive than” Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:28 am
It points out that “You would need to have fairly sharp eyes to spot the apology which appeared in print and online under the heading ‘Gordon Brown’”. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
The case of Parkwood Leisure Limited v Alemo-Herron and others will be heard from Wednesday 13 to Thursday 14 April 2011, also by Lords Hope, Walker, Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:00 am
He also made the point that it was unsatisfactory and unfair to award such damages where the relevant state officials and Ministers had not been heard nor their assertions tested in evidence. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm
First, on Monday 4 and Tuesday 5 April 2011, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
Zinman v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 6:09 am
The March 30, 2011 Court of Appeals opinion in Brown v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:49 am
Brown, 520 U. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm
On the same day Mummery LJ heard renewed applications for permission to appeal in the case of Berezovky v Terluk. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
On Monday 28 March, Peter Stewart v The Queen will be heard by Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm
Joe Touro, Annenberg School: heard rumors that Google is starting to desilo its data: Gmail v. contextual marketing etc. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:24 pm
(By the way, we heard about Martone v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am
Black v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
On Monday 21 and Tuesday 22 March, Lords Hope, Rodger, Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear the devoluation appeal of Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 11:05 am
" Westbrook, 231 S.W.3d at 397-98 (citing Brown v. [read post]
