Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,882
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2012, 8:19 am
State after state continue to restrict abortion rights seemingly guaranteed 40 years ago in Roe v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 11:50 am
See Bryant, at 19-25Download PDF file of General Motors v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:28 pm
Mr Justice Eder held that the correct approach was that the present legislation is presumed valid but, as stated by Lord Goff in Kirklees BC v Wickes Building Supplies Ltd [1993] AC 227, the existence of the alleged defence is to be taken into account in the exercise of the court’s discretion [paragraph 78]. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:32 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:15 am
As had been held by the HL in Secretary of State for the Home Department v JJ [2008] 1 AC 385, deprivation of liberty might take a variety of forms other than classic detention in prison or strict arrest. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council (2002) 1 AC 547, Omar v Westminster City Council (2008) HLR 36 (our report), Abed v City of Westminster (2011) EWCA Civ 1406 (our report), and Temur v Hackney LBC (2014) HLR 39 (our report) had all variously held that the facts relevant at review were those that pertained at the date of the review, not at the date of the original decision. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:42 am
Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:21 am
In Utah v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 1:27 pm
The legislative purpose is to prevent persons who, having become intentionally homeless, would by obtaining temporary accommodation obtain priority in the provision of housing to which they are not entitled (see per Lord Reed in Haile v Waltham Forest London Borough Council [2015] AC 1471 at paragraphs 61 and 22). [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 6:00 am
See McClendon v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:02 am
Mandalia v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7 May 2015. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:45 pm
As stated I am also concerned for her emotional wellbeing. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm
Wainwright v Home Office [2003] UKHL 53, [2004] 2 AC 406, esp. at [33], in which the House of Lords held that there is no common law tort of invasion of privacy and that it is an area which requires a detailed approach which can be achieved only by legislation rather than the broad brush of common law principle. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm
Wainwright v Home Office [2003] UKHL 53, [2004] 2 AC 406, esp. at [33], in which the House of Lords held that there is no common law tort of invasion of privacy and that it is an area which requires a detailed approach which can be achieved only by legislation rather than the broad brush of common law principle. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 6:06 am
Low v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 4:54 am
He was, of course, referring to Barder v Barder (Caluori Intervening) [1988] AC 20, and the line of cases that followed that famous decision.Before going into the detail of the judgment, however, a brief look at the facts. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:37 am
The officer who conducted the search stated that he was looking for articles such as chalk, spray paint or highlighters that had been used in similar protests. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:45 pm
Gloucestershire County Council ex parte Barry [1997] AC 584) and in choosing between different means of meeting the assessed need [R v Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council ex parte Daykin [1998] 1 CCLR 512]. [read post]
Foreign Judgments: The Limits of Transnational Issue Estoppel, Reciprocity, and Transnational Comity
26 May 2021, 8:40 pm
A distinctive feature of Singapore law on issue estoppel is the rejection of the broadly worded “special circumstances” exception to issue in English common law (Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93). [read post]
