Search for: "ANDREWS v. STATE" Results 1101 - 1120 of 4,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2013, 2:01 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Wainwright', Fifty Years Later" Paul Butler: "Gideon's Muted Trumpet" Andrew Cohen: "How Americans Lost the Right to Counsel, 50 Years After 'Gideon'" Constitution Project video: "Defending Gideon" NACDL Report: "Rationing Justice" Interview with Karen Houppert, author of Chasing Gideon And check out the ACLU's year-long story project, which launched this week: "The Sad State of Indigent Defense Fifty Years After Gideon v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 5:27 am by André Vos and Andrew Keightley-Smith
In the recent South African Supreme Court case of Scholtz & others v The State 2018, ZASCA, the court noted that in determining the existence of corruption, the view is that “corruption is all too often an issue which has to be determined by way of inference drawn from the proven facts. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Elenis, (68 Saint Louis University Law Journal, 2024).Andrew M. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 2:29 pm by Jason Rantanen
(Also, this morning the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Apple v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 10:16 am by nflatow
Chuck Grassley, who has said he doesn’t support Hurwitz because if a law review article Hurwitz wrote on Roe v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 9:41 am
University of Toronto law professors Andrew Green and Benjamin Alarie have posted a new paper on the Social Science Research Network entitled Should They All Just Get Along? [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
Case date: 17 October 2022 Case number: No. 21-2350 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
18 May 2014, 2:43 pm by lennyesq
  New York had been one of three states that did not license or register title insurance agents. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am by Matthew Lanahan
Perry (the challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage) and United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 2:16 am by Peter Mahler
The agreement did not state that time was of the essence with regard to the ordering of the appraisal. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:58 am by Amy Howe
  In United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:56 am
So I can't state the first reason. [read post]