Search for: "Akins v. State"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 2,814
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2022, 10:37 pm
" Two recent decisions by different divisions of the Dusseldorf Regional Court show that German judges will effectively apply a "willing licensee" standard akin to what we see in standard-essential patent (SEP) cases all the time--even where a proportionality defense is raised in a non-SEP dispute.There was a little bit of a discussion after the IP Bridge v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 4:01 am
Corp. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:47 pm
TOM JUZWIAK V. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:35 am
Judge Harold Baer in Gucci America, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 10:37 am
Judge Harold Baer in Gucci America, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:18 pm
In Fraser v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 6:49 pm
In answer to the questions posed in the UPDATE below, Peter Goldberger has cited the Supreme Court's Dec. 23, 1974, decision in Schick v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 10:52 am
In Kelton v. [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 4:16 am
See Norcross v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 5:40 am
But one recent ruling out of that court seems to be getting little notice: Utah v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 6:45 am
Bell v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 4:53 am
Wade (or, to be more pedantic, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 8:15 am
To see what we mean, one need only look to United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm
Lord Justice Arnold recapped the current position in England and Wales with regards to website-blocking, noting 20th Century Fox v BT (Newzbin 2) wherein he granted the first such injunction in 2011, and the first application and injunction in relation to trade marks in Cartier v Sky. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 4:15 am
Skirchak v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 10:39 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:05 am
Simon, 51 Ohio St. 233; State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am
Texas, which is also slated for argument next Term (disclosure: Akin Gump and Howe & Russell represent the petitioner in Sossamon) may make the upcoming Term “the bellwether for the Roberts Court when it comes to either following or retreating from the Rehnquist Court” on issues relating to state sovereign immunity. [read post]
