Search for: "BOX v. STATE" Results 1101 - 1120 of 5,283
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2020, 1:46 am by Nedim Malovic
The reputation must also be prior to the filing of the contested trade mark; it must exist in the territory concerned and for the goods and/or services on which the opposition is based, andRisk of injury: registration of the contested trade mark would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the earlier trade markCase law (T-345/08, Rubinstein and L'Oréal v OHMI) has clarified that the requirements above are cumulative.Reputation of… [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 8:51 am by John T. Bradford
  Per new section 172(b)(1)(D)(v)(II), for an NOL arising in tax year 2018 or 2019, this election must be made by the due date, including extensions, for filing the taxpayer’s federal income tax return for the first taxable year ending after March 27, 2020. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 8:51 am by John T. Bradford
  Per new section 172(b)(1)(D)(v)(II), for an NOL arising in tax year 2018 or 2019, this election must be made by the due date, including extensions, for filing the taxpayer’s federal income tax return for the first taxable year ending after March 27, 2020. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 6:10 am by Hilary Page
  This decision contrasts with an Ontario Labour Relations Board (the “OLRB”) decision Watkins v The Health and Safety Association for Government Services. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 4:13 am by INFORRM
A Pandora’s box of mass connectivity, state surveillance and human rights is exploding as panic seizes the world. [read post]