Search for: "Banning Company v. California" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:30 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Rather than look at comments as a whole, or (as with some of the Facebook cases) the effect of banning, the court looks at discrete aspects of Twitter functionality as it relates to banned and muted users. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
Examples of such states include California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, and Tennessee, among others. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
There are still many questions about the scope of Twitter’s ban. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
The settlement resolves Plains’ Clean Water Act violations for 10 crude oil spills in Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Kansas, and requires the company to pay a $3.25 million civil penalty. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Farzaneh Badiei
According to Apple’s review guidelines, the company goes beyond copyright infringement and requires that apps with user-generated content also attend to objectionable materials. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
Agriculture and Nutrition LLC former Superfund Site (THAN Site) in Fresno, California was executed by the Agency on November 24, 2009. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
In National Pork Producers Council Ross, a fractured Court upheld the constitutionality of a California law banning the in-state sale of meat from pigs confined under certain “cruel” conditions. [read post]