Search for: "Bare v. Bare"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 5,017
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2007, 10:16 pm
Omaha Police Union Local 101 v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 4:13 am
Cassetica Software, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:03 am
Frerck v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:52 pm
" One Justice concurred with the opinion but wrote a lengthy comment separately saying, ". . .I write separately to observe that there is much to be said for Petitioners' argument that EPA should not be permitted to base NESHAP standards on bare emissions data, and that EPA should instead isolate the effect of emissions control technology by controlling for input quality. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:52 pm
" One Justice concurred with the opinion but wrote a lengthy comment separately saying, ". . .I write separately to observe that there is much to be said for Petitioners' argument that EPA should not be permitted to base NESHAP standards on bare emissions data, and that EPA should instead isolate the effect of emissions control technology by controlling for input quality. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 2:28 am
Last year the IPKat reported on a fiercely-contested preliminary skirmish in the battle of the dairies in JN Dairies Ltd v Johal Dairies Ltd, Gurbir Singh, where a scheduled four-day hearing took twice as long thanks to a superfluity of witness evidence (see earlier IPKat comment here). [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 2:42 pm
A mostly off-topic note on yesterday's apportionment decision, Evenwel v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:02 pm
Twombly and Ashcroft v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:41 pm
V. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
Alliance Fund II, L.P. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 8:19 am
Case Citation: Dangaard v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 1:30 pm
August 12, 2020 U.S. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 6:27 am
She wasn’t brought to the hospital until the following morning when she was barely breathing. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization Symposium on Alexander Keyssar, Why Do We Still Have the Electoral College? [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
To the WSJ, it is so axiomatic that the suit is frivolous that they barely discuss its factual allegations or legal theory. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 9:15 am
In the case of Aleman v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:19 am
Such was the case in M.R. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:44 am
More on La Resolana Architects, PA v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 9:00 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Williams v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 7:02 am
" Vacation Exchange, LLC v. [read post]
