Search for: "Billings v. United States" Results 1101 - 1120 of 10,189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2009, 10:41 am
In the spirit of comity, I would ask then that the President of the United States' change of position on the individual mandate from his stated position in his campaign for the Presidency be considered: The argument about the evil of the individual mandate is all wrong. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 1:42 pm by NARF
United States (Minor Offense in Indian Country; Criminal Jurisdiction) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2022.html Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:20 am by Rahul Bhagnari
Two years to the day after the Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:52 am by Lewis Gainor
The process of indictment by grand jury involves a hearing before the grand jury in secret in which the United States Attorney presents evidence through witness testimony and exhibits, the grand jury deliberates, and then the grand jury returns a bill. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 5:55 am
The United States filed an amicus brief at the meri [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 3:26 pm by Unknown
United States (Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium; FTCA)State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlMoyant v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 3:11 pm by Native American Rights Fund
The United States (Breach of Settlement Agreement)Mishewal Wappo Tribe of Alexander Valley v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit  Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit  Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 7:25 am
The most notorious example of this is the United States Supreme Court's decision in Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 7:44 am by Joel R. Brandes
Second, taking care of the Children may require that Respondent travel to Europe, or the Children visit the United States. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:15 am by Conor McEvily
United States, continued to keep Court watchers and commentators busy yesterday. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:12 am by Lawrence Solum
The key is what relationship a right must stand to citizens of the United States to count. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
These philosophies also found their way into the controversial 2010 SCOTUS decision in Citizens United v. [read post]