Search for: "Blues v. State" Results 1101 - 1120 of 3,769
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2011, 9:25 am
(Blue Cross) would substantially reduce health-insurance competition in the state. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
In its judgement in the case of Benedik v Slovenia the Fourth Section of the Court held i that there had been a violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) with regard to the failure of the Slovenian police to obtain a court order before accessing subscriber information associated with a dynamic IP address[1]. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
The judge held that the terms of the 30 October Licence permitted the Club to “continue to provide insurance cover in accordance with the Blue Cards issued to IRISL for a period of 3 months [or until the Club was] discharged from liability by the State Authorities to whom the Blue Cards have been issued, whichever is the sooner”. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:41 am
  To balance the scales, I’m going to give a belated snap to the prosecutors in State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 6:40 pm by Mark Tushnet
It too would be determined in each state by the state's own processes, subject perhaps to the possibility, flagged in the literature on Powell v. [read post]