Search for: "Borders v. Borders"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 6,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2011, 2:37 am
Regina (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 681; [2011] WLR (D) 190 “When deciding whether to grant leave to remain in the United Kingdom to a non-EEA economic migrant it was not open to the Secretary of State to treat the certificate of sponsorship issued by the migrant’s employer as invalid in reliance on the fact that the migrant’s job fell below the relevant NVQ/SVQ level specified in a separate document… [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 8:23 am
Womack v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 3:11 pm
Customs and Border Protection Agency, Department of Homeland Security et al. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 6:01 pm
Just add this to the list of areas (border searches, aerial surveillance, etc.) in which you are subject to being searched and/or seized for any, or no, reason. [read post]
11 May 2008, 4:14 am
After a series of challenges, the United States Supreme Court approved the condemnation in Kelo v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 8:34 am
A recent post at Time.com discussed how the US v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:30 am
Chad v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:30 am
Chad v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:30 am
Chad v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 5:21 am
If you’re interested in finding out more, check out Weber v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 8:14 am
Supreme Court’s decision in McGirt v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 9:38 am
The case is known as the Steel Seizure Cases or Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 1:13 pm
The post Amicus Brief Explains in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
Mexican border. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
Tendayi Achiume, Race, Borders, and Jurisdiction [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am
-Mexico border and kill Mexican nationals. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 10:07 am
Those in favor of hunting down illegal immigrants who come to this country looking to better themselves will probably view this story as a victory. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:00 am
We’re pleased to report that, in Martin v. [read post]
