Search for: "Britain v. Britain"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,618
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2011, 11:35 am
QUEENER: Well - JUSTICE SCALIA: -- because there really isn't any perfect remedy.In 1803, in Marbury v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:51 am
That was the allegation in Sawicki v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:08 am
Judges » Great Britain » Drama. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
In the courts Gale & Anor v Serious Organised Crime Agency [2011] UKSC 49 (26 October 2011): Supreme Court: Criminal standard of proof not required by fair trial rights for confiscation under Proceeds of Crime Act. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 8:20 am
One of the sites contained the rare Western Liverwort (Marsupella profunda), which, I am reliably informed (by Wikipedia), is found in only 3 places in Britain, all in Cornwall. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:41 am
It may well have been that differences of opinion on that debate lay behind the majority and minority opinions in Hirst v United Kingdom back in 2005. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day, Sea Search Armada v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am
…and don’t forget our recent posts: Can Britain “ignore Europe on human rights”? [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
Sawicki v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:29 pm
A long-running saga came to an end at the High Court in London on 7 October 2011, in Adelson v Anderson [2011] EWHC 2497 (QB). [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:36 pm
’” [@ScottKGraham on dissent in Starr v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:34 am
The Attorney General, Dominic Grieve, has now entered the fray by insisting the Human Rights Acts has been beneficial for Britain and condemning the “hysterical untruths” printed by newspapers about its perverse effects. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:34 am
The Attorney General, Dominic Grieve, has now entered the fray by insisting the Human Rights Acts has been beneficial for Britain and condemning the “hysterical untruths” printed by newspapers about its perverse effects. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:12 am
Aiyer’s judicial dictionary : a complete law lexicon Nagpur : LexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa, 2011 2 v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am
The Commission argues that Britain does not need its own, home-grown right to reside test because the EU has agreed a separate “habitual residence” test, which Britain could apply in order to prevent benefit tourism. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 6:58 am
These are some of the things I've been tweeting about today: ben zimmer in @TheAtlantic on: "The Rise of the Zuckerverb: The New Language of Facebook" http://j.mp/oI7DKJ is twitter exporting american narcissism to britain (and the rest of the world)? [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:29 am
Titanic, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:10 am
Toronto, Ont. : Osgoode Professional Development, 2011 1 v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:37 am
In the courts A.A. v. [read post]
