Search for: "CASH v. UNITED STATES"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 2,411
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2014, 7:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 3:47 pm
United States, a recent decision from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:28 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[xiii] An excellent discussion of the legislative history and Congressional intent of this statute is discussed in United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
” Century Vilage, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 6:52 am
In Saucier v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:46 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:46 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:47 pm
October 2012 (MC)), investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, sued for defamation (For example, see Applause Store Productions Ltd v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781; Cairns v Modi [2012] EWHC 756 (QB); [2012] EWCA Civ 1382; Tilbrook v Parr [2012] EWHC 1946 (QB). [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:46 am
Over the weekend, the United States and its allies conducted 22 air strikes against ISIS forces inside Iraq. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm
That person, if the United States is right, has committed a criminal offense, because she structured cash transactions “for the specific purpose of depriving the Government of the information that Section 5313(a) is designed to obtain. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 9:35 am
In support of that assertion, the State cites United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 1:58 pm
The case is Integrity Staffing Solutions v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 10:20 am
Nonetheless, one New Jersey woman is seeking to put an immediate halt on Disney’s cash cow with the filing of her complaint for copyright infringement in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:12 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
Using the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart v Dukes as its guide, the court also held the plaintiffs lacked commonality. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:43 am
Affirming the fee award, a Sixth Circuit panel explained that accepting the lower offer was one measure of success (or lack thereof), that Rule 68 did not conflict with the fee-shifting statute at issue, and that the reduction was reasonable (McKelvey v Secretary of United States Army, September 18, 2014, Sutton, J). [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
If such a device existed, it would have broken on Thursday, when the government gave its closing argument in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
If such a device existed, it would have broken on Thursday, when the government gave its closing argument in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
