Search for: "Canada v. State" Results 1101 - 1120 of 6,315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2014, 2:34 pm by Larry
I need to give you a post on GRK Canada v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:48 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of Canada conducted an exercise of statutory interpretation over the Occupier’s Liability Act, which was created in 1980, in the 1991 case of Waldick v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 9:54 am
from its place of business in Canada, it did not sell or import the product in the United States, and thus there was no subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiff's infringement claims. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:35 am by Jon Sands
This is stated in the statute. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:22 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Morris, 2018 ONSC 5186 “Mr. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am by INFORRM
  The Supreme Court of Canada has held that s.8 affords constitutional protection of a person’s reasonable expectation of privacy (see: Hunter v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 8:24 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
First, section 174 of the Canada Labour Code states the simple fact that overtime work must be compensated and that it must be compensated at least at what is commonly known as “time-and-a-half. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 10:34 am
Ultimately, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief, stating: "The DNR shall promptly take all action necessary to insure no further taking of threatened Canada Lynx by trapping or snaring activities within the core Canada Lynx ranges, including, but not limited to: applying for an incidental take permit for Canada Lynx on or before April 30, 2008... [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:15 am by Brian Gray (CA)
The value of reliance on a trade-mark registration, as opposed to prior use, stands out sharply in the recent Federal Court of Appeal of Canada case Pizzaiolo Restaurants Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:15 am by Brian Gray (CA)
The value of reliance on a trade-mark registration, as opposed to prior use, stands out sharply in the recent Federal Court of Appeal of Canada case Pizzaiolo Restaurants Inc. v. [read post]